|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
10925
   |
Posted - 2017.07.10 05:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Fallout 4 was a huge open world, and was worse off for it.
It seems like they spend more time making a large world than they do making game play fun.
I am ok with less of an open world if the game play is fun.
That's not why Fallout 4 is deemed an inferior Fallout game...
Scouts United
Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
10925
|
Posted - 2017.07.10 05:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Destiny 2 won't have his maps for PvP.
CoD has small maps.
Titanfall 2,even with their titans, had small maps.
PvP games that only offer boots-on-ground gameplay have small maps to suit their player limit and the interactivity between each player. If vehicles are in the game, of course the maps would be bigger so as to better suit all play styles. Just look at Battlefield 4.
EDIT: Forgot to mention that Evolve had big maps and the players didn't like the game because it was more like Hide N Seek.
Scouts United
Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
10926
|
Posted - 2017.07.10 08:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I'm excited for SC 3.0 to drop so I can finally go do some proper planetary scouting. Here's hoping the base building modules get online sometime in '18 and I can finally realize the dream that DUST initially sparked in me: hunting down planets, prospecting the most defensible locations on the most profitable planets, then designing the defenses and selling the coordinates.
Here's hoping. Overwatch covers my CQC itch in the meantime.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes! Yes! YES! YEEEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!
SO excited for 3.0!
Scouts United
Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
10927
|
Posted - 2017.07.10 21:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Joel II X wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Fallout 4 was a huge open world, and was worse off for it.
It seems like they spend more time making a large world than they do making game play fun.
I am ok with less of an open world if the game play is fun. That's not why Fallout 4 is deemed an inferior Fallout game... It was inferior because the story was half assed. Why was the story half assed? Because they spent too much of their limited resources on making such a massive map instead of on plot and game play. So whether or not it was THE reason Fallout 4 was not great, it was certainly one of the big reasons.
Actually, their big map, being dense with so many things to do was a positive thing.
The reasons why it didn't live up to the Fallout community's expectations was because it lacked proper RPG elements, and it turned into simple a game like Skyrim. It no longer had consequences to your actions, and the game didn't recognize your achievements. You were just another guy with a gun.
That is why Fallout didn't go well with the niche community. That said, it did extremely well with the general audience, and in terms of sales, that's all that matters. I think it's their most successful game, beating even Skyrim, if I remember correctly.
If Fallout 4 had a small map, say the size of 1/4 of the actual map, then that'd be a problem.
Scouts United
Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
|
|
|
| |
|